“Wanted: Data Superstar – Build and maintain data pipelines; perform in-depth data analysis; develop and deploy machine learning models; provide production dashboard support; create executive dashboards; predict future trends”
We come across dozens of these descriptions every month – typically for an entry-level salary, no less. It demanded everything from a single person – at least 10 different specialised skills spanning across multiple disciplines.
Sound familiar? This approach to data hiring isn’t just unrealistic – it is nefarious for either data infrastructure scalability or the quality of your insights, and it is actively harmful to your business growth.
The True Cost of Hunting Unicorns
Recruiting data talent is both slow and expensive. Recent industry reports found hiring a single data scientist in Europe takes 20+ weeks and costs upwards of £10,000 in recruitment fees alone. In the US, the situation is even worse: 40 weeks and over $15,000 before anyone writes a single line of SQL.
That’s not just a statistic, it’s months of competitive advantage slipping away while your data sits untouched.
The Single Point of Failure Problem
Placing all your data needs on one person inevitably backfires. Modern data work spans multiple disciplines:
- Data engineering
- Infrastructure management & dev ops
- Analytics and modelling
- Business intelligence
- Data science
- Business consulting.
Chasing a “data unicorn,” a single hire who can handle all aspects of data work, is fundamentally flawed.
It is not just highly unlikely they’ll be equally great at all skills – it creates a dangerous single point of failure. When that person inevitably leaves (or becomes overwhelmed!), your entire data capability collapses.
The Squad Approach: Faster, Better, More Resilient
At Tasman, we’ve developed a fundamentally different model. Instead of betting everything on finding and retaining that mythical perfect hire, we deploy a pre-formed fractional data squad consisting of five senior data experts working in concert on your prioritised backlog.
The commercial benefit is clear: you pay roughly the cost of 1.5 full-time employees but receive the complete skill set and bandwidth of an entire data department. Upsize Magazine notes fractional talent models can reduce headcount costs by 30–40 per cent since you only pay for the exact capacity you need.
The result?
- Full bench-strength expertise from day one
- Rapid delivery on your most critical data projects
- No single person burning out or becoming a bottleneck
- Flexibility to scale up or down as your requirements change
Three Clear Signs You Need a Squad, Not a Lone Hire
- Missed commercial targets: Growth initiatives stall because you lack timely, reliable data to inform strategic decisions. You keep pushing back insights projects because of “resource constraints”.
- Perpetually slow-moving data projects: Your analytics backlog keeps growing and deadlines consistently slip despite hiring efforts. You keep seeing data as a cost-centre as they are just firefighting, not producing novel, actionable insights.
- High team churn or tool paralysis: Data people keep coming and going, or endless debates about tools and approaches happen without tangible progress.
Real Business Outcomes, Not Technical Experiments
The proof is in the commercial impact. For a bedwear e-commerce company, our squad delivered what multiple individual hires couldn’t: clear attribution connecting marketing spend to actual revenue outcomes, transforming campaign ROI from guesswork to precision.
For a family photo sharing app, struggling with retention, we quickly identified feature-level churn drivers allowing the product team to fix exactly what was hurting user retention instead of making educated guesses.
In both cases, a coordinated multi-person team delivered answers in days that would have taken a lone hire months – if they managed it at all.
Stop wasting time and resources chasing unicorns. Book a 30-minute backlog review with our team and discover whether our proven squad model could be the answer to your data capability challenges.